Wednesday, August 17, 2005

Eyes down, kid!!!

"I am three years older than you ..U bastard...What the fuck are you staring at??? wanna black eye?? or a punch straight at the solar plexus?? Do u really think you can get away with this ???Get the fuck away from my path....What the fuck do you think you are ,wearing that orange wierd piece of a tattered cloth???.... "
This is what i try to tell every fresher who gets anywhere near my way...
But, as Mr.Lenin(not the great socialist who brought about a revolution, but the warden) has other ideas for me, I end up moving out of the way and crawling away...
Anyway,
Have you ever wondered the importance of the way of interpreting anything that is written?
What is the effect of a left justified line on the user?? and that of a right justified one??

How would small look like place near big?? small big

something looks really wrong here..Why shouldnt the word small be a bit bigger than big??? Is it an implicit assumption that not only the objective that the word is intended for but also the means, the word itself, should be self-explanative. If so, then, what really is the necessity for me to use language?? anything small like a rat, can be written in real small font and an elephant in huge font...
Look at this one:
n a r r o w wide

Can you really read narrow and interpret pefectly at first glance?? Each time I look at narrow, again and again, it appears to me as n followed by the word arrow..Each space between letters is of the same length.But our mind still refuses to accept narrow to be really wide..though I wonder why wide can be not so wide. ..But narrow can never be wide...

have a look at small and big in the webdings font:
small small big big
now the only impression of big in this word is that huge block for the letter G in the word which makes it really look big...try finding words with G...huGe,Giant...Was G supposed to be the keyword for something big???

Now suppose I was in this farm in some small quiet village.The whole scene with a setting sun and me with a straw hat and a rake in one hand and looking at dry leaves will be
silence
And this does not look odd...But what if it was not silence, but SILENCE ??
It would look very weird describing something that is peaceful and quiet so boldly and loudly...

Now try this:
sex sex
the sex on the right is a lot more explicit than the sex on the left. See what I mean?? The brains is merely a spectator..It's the eyes and the scene that play the magic on us...
Anyway, to summarize, I wanted to say that a HOT female would help my brain develop a lot...Eye Candy please..My eyes are the only source for my brain to interpret and learn things...Get this in your heads ,faculty

and thinking of all these things.... can u imagine the context I am using 'pant' in, if I type pant ..

I still cannot make out the use of italics.But, at times, it has worked miracles... and of course, the exclamation mark is just to good for our brain to grasp a situation of just words and make a perfect scene that an author tries to convey.
. how about bark?? If I type bark!!!! it shows the barking of a crazy dog that amazes the writer while if I type BARK, this looks more familiar to a tree's main portion.

11 comments:

Divzie said...

hmm..actually the bark part, i thought was the other way round. bark=tree bark, BARK=dog barking coz of the emphasis on capitals which signify loudness and eventually the sound made by the animal. onomatoepia! anyway, nice post..which is why im soo fascinated by the brain! Nueroscience baby!:D

Gururaj said...

that is, I think because, u implicitly assume a dog's bark to be loud..And since I had a small pom, it rarely used to bark or for that matter get up from it's slumber..So, to me barking and talking are both at the same frequency...Atleast, I think so now

Naresh said...

omg omg!!!
several revelations thr... this is wht i call something more than wht meets da eye...

Divzie said...

hmm yeh i guess how you make associations to particular things also matter

I Am Sam said...

why they have made the word abbreviation so large when they are supposed to compress it.. quite vague.. what we think is what we see.. sometimes red looks more reddish..(i think this is common to many of us) and after all everything is about perception..isn't it?

Rahul said...

You have a left brain and a right brain. Bloody both of them duel and rarely do we have a constant winner. That's why all differences :p

Sweet god gave me none of these, ignorance is bliss :D

Arpit said...

maybe this applies to u..
there are two parts of our brain: left and right. ur right part has nothing left in it and ur left part has nothing right in it.
wierd comment for wierd post! :D

Anonymous said...

whats wrong?? ;))

waddup??

parwana said...

U n i q U e :)

Smartalec said...

cool post, dude! really CoOl! probably could end up as one of the abstarct passages that we get in the reading comprehension section of the CAT:P!

Veiled Enigma said...

very cool post, which is one of the reasons why im doing psychology...as Rahul put it, we do have 2 sides of the brains which are in constant competition to gain our attention...so differnt people will view those things differently!!! most people will view them the way u describes....but others...well, dats a different story now!!!!